3/18/2024 0 Comments Photoshop cs2 vs gimpSee, for example, Bruce Lindbloom's article on the so-called "challenge". don't take articles from 2003 citing non-luminaries like Dan Margulis as gospel re: 8 vs 16 bit." There is some rubbish in this thread, but the recognition that posterization can be an issue during BW conversions is not part of it. But if you apply a yellow or red filter or darken the sky by working with levels or curves you can quite quickly end up with banding and other issues in your BW rendition. If you simply to a "normal" BW conversion and leave the sky alone you won't have any big problem. Sky is probably the best know example since it is virtually entirely blue channel and since the luminosity is smoothly graduated. It is pretty easy to demonstrate posterization in black and white conversions, particularly with portions of the image that are nearly but not quite uniform and which contain mostly one color channel. The idea that Photoshop users select it as a "status symbol" rather than as a tool is just nuts. I happen to use Photoshop? I'm guessing that most users of the GIMP feel the same way - we all use whatever tool we happen to choose for whatever reason we choose it. I don't have anything against anyone who uses a different application than I do.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |